Teaching English to Refugees in a Multilevel Classroom
In order to assess the teaching of English to refugees in a multilevel classroom, a pedagogical investigation was carried out with the mixed paradigm: qualitative and quantitative, with a sample of six students who formed part of a family of refugees, from whom two were illiterate adults, two were adolescents and two were children. The adolescents and children had different educational levels, the first two were Senior High School students, one child was a Junior High School student, and the other one was in the first level of Basic Education. They were taught English for six hours a week in the Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador in Esmeraldas, Ecuador, as part of a project of connection with the community. The analytic-synthetic and hermeneutic methods were used, with the technique of observation. A quasi-experiment was done with the use of a pre-test and a post-test. The results showed that at the beginning of the experience the students were not able to use English in basic communicative functions or with basic knowledge about the alphabet and numbers; but after using strategies concerning the classroom arrangement in pairs and groups and the use of a combination of methods for language teaching, the adult students were able to have some interaction in English with the younger students. One of the children (a girl), who was in Junior High School, participated actively and influenced the learning process of the adults and of the younger child, who had never studied English before. It is concluded that the English-language teaching-learning process to refugees in a multilevel classroom demands creativity on the part of the teacher, motivation, a combination of methodologies and needs assessment in order to find out the contents the students need to learn, which is in relation to the language of survival.
Key words: teaching English; refugees; multilevel classroom; pedagogical investigation
Alexander, D. (1993). The ESL classroom as community: How self-assessment can work. "Adventures in Assessment: Learner-Centered Approaches to Assessment and Evaluation in Adult Literacy," 4, 34-37.
Bell, J. (1991). "Teaching multilevel classes in ESL." San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
Bell, J. & Burnaby, B. (1984). A handbook for ESL literacy. Toronto, Ontario: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Press.
Condelli, L., Wrigley, H.S.,Yoon, K., Cronen, S., &. Seburn, M. (2003). What Works Study for Adult ESL Literacy Students: Final Report. Washington D.C.: American Institute for Research.
Ferlazzo, L (2014). Instructional strategies for multi-level classes of English language learners. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/larry- ferlazzo/larry-ferlazzo-instructional-strategies- multi-level-classes-english- language
Holt, G.M. (1995). "Teaching low-level adult ESL learners." ERIC Digest. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education. Retrieved from https://www.ericdigests.org/1996-1/low.htm
Isserlis, J. (2000). Trauma and the adult English language student. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/caela/esl_resources/digests/trauma2.html
Roberts, M. (2007). Teaching in the Multilevel Classroom. Pearson Education. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonlongman.com/ae/download/adulted/multilevel_monograph.pdf
Shank, Cathy C. & Terrill, Lynda R. (1995). “Teaching Multilevel Adult ESL Classes.” ERIC Digest No. ED383242. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for ESL Literacy Education. Retrieved from: http://www.ericdigests.org/1996-1/adult.htm
Wrigley, H.S. & Guth, G. (1992). Bringing literacy to life: Issues and options in adult ESL literacy. San Mateo, CA: Aguirre International. (EDRS No. ED 348 896). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED348896.pdf
How to Cite
Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Esmeraldas Campus.
The scientific journals which signed the agreements from the Encounters of Latin-American Journals are authorized to reproduce, in part or completely, the articles published here, with only the mention to the source clearly pointed out. Other interested parties will be able to reproduce the contents previous authorization of the editor- in- chief of the journal.
The articles and papers published are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the thought of our Editorial Board.